Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.54 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 29 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 141 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab And Ors vs Jagjit Singh And Ors on 26 October, 2016
1.3. Learned counsel for the review applicants argued that
the review applicants are still being denied the increment
in salary at par with the other similarly situated employees.
Placing reliance upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in State of Punjab vs Jagjit Singh (2017)
1 SCC 148, she further argued that Equal Pay for Equal
Work is a right based on Article 14 and the review
applicants are entitled to increments and the arrears as
prayed for in M.A No.2891/2021.
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Central Inland Water ... vs Brojo Nath Ganguly & Anr on 6 April, 1986
1.6. Learned counsel for the review applicants further
argued that it is a settled law that even in the case of
contractual appointment Article 14, 16 and 21 of the
Constitution has to be followed and the Hon'ble Tribunal
erred in considering that the applicants herein are only
being employed through the Contractual Policy by the
respondents and the terms and conditions of the contract
will be strictly applicable to them. This finding is contrary
to Para 89 of Central Inland Water Transport
Corporation vs Brojo Nath Ganguly AIR (1986) SC 1571.
which was relied upon wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court
held that owing to unequal bargaining power, the court is
required to ascertain whether a contractual term or a
contract is unfair, unreasonable or unconscionable.
1.7.