Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.42 seconds)B.Madhan vs The Registrar on 10 December, 2014
In the said
circumstances and taking note of the fact that the orders of
attachment of the property in question were after the
creation of equitable mortgage of the same with Federal Bank
we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned
judgment passed by the learned Single Judge following the
dictum in Madhan's case (supra), carrying the directions to
effect mutation of the property as also to efface all
encumbrance over the property effected after 27.6.2014, the
date on which the property in question was mortgaged with
Federal Bank." (underline supplied)
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 84 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 89 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
1