Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.43 seconds)
Sushila Yadav vs State Of U P And 5 Others on 15 September, 2021 cites

Smt. Usha Rani vs State Of U. P. And Anr. on 11 December, 2019

The petitioners have placed reliance upon the decision rendered by a learned Judge in Usha Rani Vs. State of U.P. And 6 Others3 to contend that the question of whether gratuity would be payable irrespective of whether an option had been exercised by an employee prior to attaining the age of superannuation and untimely death stood settled in their favour. Usha Rani was dealing with a case where the employee had died prior to attaining the age of retirement which at the relevant time was fixed at 60 years.
Allahabad High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 1613 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Smt. Omwati vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ... on 24 February, 2020

Similar controversy was also decided by Lucknow Bench of this Court vide order dated 5.8.2019 passed in the matter of Smt. Mala Tripathi (Supra) in which Court has taken a similar view and held that if husband of petitioner died before attaining the age of 60 years and has not given option for retirement at the age of 60 years, gratuity cannot be denied only on this ground. Relevant paragraph of the said judgment is quoted below:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 47 - Full Document

Smt. Sarvesh Kumari vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 14 May, 2019

"By this appeal, a challenge is made to the judgment dated 07.11.2019 and its correction order dated 12.12.2019 whereby the writ petition preferred by the non-appellant was allowed. The writ petition was ordered to governed by the judgment in the case of Smt. Sarvesh Kumari Vs. State of U.P. others decided on 14.05.2019 and also in the leading case of Smt. Ranjana Kakkar Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2008 (10) ADJ 63.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 28 - M K Gupta - Full Document

Smt. Ranjana Kakkad vs The State Of M.P. on 30 April, 2015

"By this appeal, a challenge is made to the judgment dated 07.11.2019 and its correction order dated 12.12.2019 whereby the writ petition preferred by the non-appellant was allowed. The writ petition was ordered to governed by the judgment in the case of Smt. Sarvesh Kumari Vs. State of U.P. others decided on 14.05.2019 and also in the leading case of Smt. Ranjana Kakkar Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2008 (10) ADJ 63.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 520 - Full Document
1