Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Section 4 in U.P Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in U.P Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in U.P Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 [Entire Act]
Chaudhary Raj Kumar Singh Member & ... vs State Of U.P. & 3 Others on 24 February, 2015
4. Having considered the aforesaid submissions, this Court is reminded of the Division Bench decision of this Court in Public Interest Ligation (PIL) No.2486 of 2015 - M/s. Runup Gramodyog Evam Sewa Sansthan through its President v. State of U.P. and others, decided on 23.03.2022. Considering the dictum as laid down in the aforesaid decision that a writ petition assailing a decision whereby the Consolidation Commissioner takes a call as to whether continuation of consolidation or its cancellation would be in the interest of the villagers cannot be made the subject matter of a writ petition. The relevant portion of the said order reads as under:
Agricultural & Industrial Syndicate ... vs State Of U.P. And Others on 4 May, 1973
"5. The provisions of Sections 4 and 6 of the Act came up for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in Agricultural & Industrial Syndicate Ltd. (supra). The Division Bench held that when the Director of Consolidation issues a notification under Section 4 or Section 6, he performs neither a quasi judicial function nor does he exercise an administrative power. In the view of the Division Bench, the power was of a Legislative nature. Moreover, it was held that if a notification is issued under Section 6, the land holder has no rights which are affected in consequence of such a notification.
1