Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.89 seconds)

Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd. And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors on 15 November, 1990

& Anr. v. Union Of India & Ors., 1991 Supp.(1) SCC 102. The appellant in that case had, on December 17,1987, filed the bills of entry for home consumption as required under Section 68 of the Customs Act with a prayer for debonding the goods of 3935.364 MT which were stored in a private warehouse. The customs authorities, on that very day,i.e. December 17,1987, cancelled the license for warehousing the quantity of goods in respect of which the bills of entry were filed by cancelling the bond and deleting the said godown from the relevant licence issued for the quality of 11,500 MT. The keys of the godown were also handed over to the appellant simultaneously, as a result of which though the goods remained in the said godown but not as a warehouse and the appellant was allowed to remove the goods without payment of any duty. It was not disputed that the remaining goods were also stored in a private warehouse and the appellant had filed bills of entry and compiled with all the required formalities for debonding and clearance of the goods on January 28, 1988 and that the appellant was entitled to an order made in the show cause notice dated February 16,1987 in view of the decision of this court in Wallace Flour Mills Co.Ltd. v. Collection of Central Excise, Bombay Division II 1989 (4) SCC 592, wherein it was decided that the rate of duty prevalent on the date of removal is only applicable. It was held that since the goods were removed after September 17, 1987 excise duty was payable on the same. The Assistant Collection did not go into the merits of the claim of the appellant that they were not using power for manufacture of fireworks. The said order of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise was affirmed in appeal by the Collector (Appeals) in his order dated August 1,1991.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 68 - N M Kasliwal - Full Document

Collector Of Customs vs Priyanka Overseas (P) Ltd. on 17 May, 1988

Shri K.N.Bhat, the learned Additional Solicitor General, does not dispute that in view of the decision Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd.(supra) the appellant could not be made to suffer on account of an illegal act of detention of the goods by the excise authorities and the principle of Wallace Flour Mills Company (supra) and Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. (supra) will have no application in this case. The learned additional Solicitor General has, however, urged that even on September 2,1987 the appellant was not entitled to claim exception from duty in respect of goods which where detained since there was use of power in the manufacture of the goods.
Calcutta High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Express Newspapers (Private) Ltd.,And ... vs The Union Of India And Others(And ... on 8 January, 1958

Ltd & Anr. v. Union of India(supra) is applicable in the facts of this case because the goods had been wrongly and illegally detained by the customs authorities on September 2,1987 and by the time the goods were released for clearance on the basis of the interim order passed by the High Court on September 29,1987, the exception from duty under notification No.167/86 had been withdrawn by notification No.222/87 dated December 17,1987 .
Supreme Court of India Cites 97 - Cited by 335 - Full Document
1