Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.27 seconds)

Kumar Prabhulal Shah And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 15 January, 1987

2. Notices were issued. Respondents out agpearance, fled their } Sl\reply and they have submitted that the applicants were appointed as Tailors in 1 EME Centre and EME Depot. As ser the Hon'ble Supreme Court order in Prabhulal Vs. Union of India and others (WP No.492 of 1991) Hon'ble High Court of AP & Telangana State, Hyderabad order dated 14.06.2012 (WP No.4065 of 2002), pay scales of the applicants were upgraded w.e.f. 16.10.1981 and arrears were also paid in the pay scale of Rs. 260-6-290-EB-390- 10-400 and subsequently ACP/MACP have also been granted.
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

All India C.P.W.D.Employees Union And ... vs The Union Of India And 6 Others on 10 July, 2017

. ' The non-industrial workers are granted five scales by the Government of india, Ministry of Defence vide its order dated 22.08.1983 viz., Unskiled : Rs.196-220, Semiskilled Rs.216-290, Skilled Rs.260-356, Highly Skilled-li ; Rs.330-480 and Highly Skilled-} Rs.380-560. The grievance of the applicants is that after they have got promotion of skilled labour they are not considered for further post of Highly Skiled-l or H. For that they have cited a judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court of india In W.P.(C) No.492/1991 Sri Prabhulal and another Vs. Union of India and others. The petitioners who are boot makers claim that by virtue of the fetter dated 16.10.1984 wherein it has been mentioned that President has accorded sanction to the upgradation of certain jobs which Is that of boot makers ds from Semi Skilled Rs.210-290 to Skilled grade 260-400 w.e.f. 16.10.1984 and they are too entitled to be placed in the higher grade. Even though there are directions of Haon'ble Supre Court, the respondents were not acceded to their request and they are stagnated in the level of skilled labourer. Feeling aggrieved by this, they have made detailed representations and filed this auplication for the following relief :
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - R K Deshpande - Full Document
1