Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.28 seconds)

Bachan Singh vs Swaran Singh on 6 March, 2000

It is not disputed that in the suit filed by the plaintiff, he is found to be in possession of 77 kanals 16 marlas of joint land. The defendants failed to prove that any partition had takn place. Thus, the plaintiff has been found to be in possession of 77 kanals 16 marlas to the knowledge of the defendants and apprehension to ouster the plaintiff, the injunction can be granted restraining the other co-sharers from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has been in successfully able to prove that he is in exclusive possession of the land. As per the revenue records pertaining to the year 1975-76, he is in exclusive possession of this land. The circumstances in which a RSA No. 3123 of 1984 -5- co-owner is in possession can seek injunction against the other co- owner have been culled out by Division Bench of this Court rendered in a case of 'Bachan Singh vs. Swaran Singh, 2000(3) R.C.R (Civil) 70'. In para 15, it has been held as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 141 - T H Chalapathi - Full Document
1