Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 35 (0.25 seconds)The Essential commodities act 1955
Section 114 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 465 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
B. Saha And Ors vs M. S. Kochar on 27 July, 1979
16.1 In the case of Shambhoo Nath Mishra Versus State
Of U.P and others (1997) 5 SCC 326, the Supreme Court
referred to the judgement of B.Saha vs M.S.Kochar
(supra). In the aforesaid case, a complaint was filed under
Sections 409, 420, 465, 468, 477-A against a cashier who after
fabricating the signature of the complainant therein
withdrew money. The High Court recorded a finding that the
act was done in discharge of duties as there was a reasonable
connection between the act and discharge of official duties.
In this context, while setting aside the judgement of the High
Court, the Supreme Court in its order observed as under:
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Parkash Singh Badal And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 6 December, 2006
16.2 In the case of Parkash Singh Badal (supra), the
Supreme Court has referred to a judgement in the case of
P.K. Pradhan versus State Of Sikkim (2001)6 SCC 704.