Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.15 seconds)

Sau. Pooja W/O. Shrikant Kale vs Shrikant Rameshwarrao Kale on 10 April, 2023

16. The learned counsel for the appellant-husband heavily relied on the judgment of this court, Bench at Nagpur in the case of Pooja vs. Shrikant Rameshwarrao Kale (supra), wherein this court has upheld the decree of nullity passed by the family court on the ground of concealment of the disease known as 'Ptosis' of wife by her family members by considering Section 12(1)(c) of the Act. This court in para 25 of the aforesaid judgment, has made following observations:
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - V G Joshi - Full Document

K. Shanmugha Raja @ Raja vs Shanthakumari on 30 November, 2018

In the case of K. Shanmugha Raja @ Raja vs. Shanthakumari, reported in 2018 SCC OnLine Mad 9397, the 11 Judgment in FCA 92-23 Madras High Court, taking guidance from the observations of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Firm Sriniwas Ram Kumar v. Mahabir Prasad (AIR 1951 SC 177) and Bhagwati Prasad v. Shri Chandra Maul (AIR 1966 SC 735), considered the case of the appellant under Section 12(1)(c) of the Act. In that case, the respondent-wife had suppressed her religion as Christian at the time of marriage and had married with the appellant by falsely representing herself as a Hindu.
Madras High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - R Subbiah - Full Document
1