cites: 86834075

The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 20290

Section 53A in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 5385

Section 45 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 362

Section 50C in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2657

Transfer of Property Act, 1977

State of Jammu-Kashmir - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 2056

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Mormasji Mancharji Vaid on 15 June, 2001

^^foØ; fd;s x;s fuEufyf[kr mRrjh Hkkx IykV dk okLrfod dCtk izFke i{k us f}rh; i{k dks iwoZ esa gh ekSd a sa ij djk fn;k gSA^^ On the basis of the above said position, after relying on the judgments in the case of CIT vs. Mormasji Mancharji Vaid (2001) 168 CTR 565 (Guj.

Gujarat High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 36 - Full Document

Section 54F in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2615

Chaturbhuj Dwarkadas Kapadia vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 13 February, 2003

Dwarkadas Kapadia vs. CIT (2003) 180 CTR 107 (Bom), and Jasbir Singh Sarkaria, in re (2007) 212 CTR 107 (AAR), it was submitted that no capital gain liability arose in A.Y. 2008-09.

Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 223 - S H Kapadia - Full Document

Smt. Shashi Varma vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 15 March, 1996

Smt. Shashi Varma vs. CIT (1999) 152 CTR (MP) 227 CIT vs. Sardarmal Kothari (2008) 217 CTR (Mad) 414 Mrs. Seetha Subramanian vs. ACIT (1996) 56 TTJ (Mad) 417 Smt. Rajneet Sandhu vs DCIT (2010) 133 TTJ (Chd)(UO) 64 Smt. Usha Vaid vs ITO in ITA No. 98/(Asr)/2011 Gyan Chand Batra vs ITO (2010) 133 TTJ 482 (JP) 17 ITA No. 340/JP/2013 a.y. 2008-09 Shri Hardayal Singh vs DCIT, Circle, Jaipur.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Gyan Chand Jain vs Ito on 18 September, 2000