Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.21 seconds)Banarsi Dass vs State Of Haryana on 5 April, 2010
20. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied upon authority
Banarsi Dass vs. State of Haryana 2010(3) JT 552. The said authority
is distinguishable as in that case both complainant and shadow witness
Criminal Appeal No.477 SB of 2003 9
have not supported the prosecution regarding demand and acceptance of
illegal gratification. So, the said authority is distinguishable.
Raghu Nath Bansal vs State Of Punjab on 9 December, 2009
In authority Raghu Nath Bansal 's
case (supra) the complainant was inimical towards the accused which fact
has been proved on the file.
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1