Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.54 seconds)
P.D. Agrawal vs State Bank Of India & Ors on 28 April, 2006 cites

State Of Orissa vs Bidyabhujshan Mohapatra on 19 October, 1962

".It was urged that the Court should not have assumed that the General Manager would have inflicted the punishment of dismissal solely on the basis of the second charge and consequently the punishment should not be sustained if it was held that one of the two charges on the basis of which it was imposed was unsustainable. This was rejected following the decision in State of Orissa v. Bidyabhan Mohapatra, where it was said that if an order in an enquiry under Article 311 can be supported on any finding as substantial misdemeanour for which punishment imposed can lawfully be given, it is not for the Court to consider whether that ground alone would have weighed with the authority in imposing the punishment in question. In our view that principle can have no application to the facts of this case. Although the enquiry officer found in fact that the respondent had behaved insolently towards the Warehouse Master, he did not come to the conclusion that this act of indiscipline on a solitary occasion was sufficient to warrant an order of dismissal."
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 229 - J C Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next