Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 43 (0.64 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 33 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
P.V. Narasimha Rao vs State(Cbi/Spe) on 17 April, 1998
295 In view of above discussion this Court is of opinion
that ratio of law laid down in P V Narsimha Rao's Case on 17.4.98
is not applicable to our case, charge sheet of which was filed on
9.6.97 and cognizance of offences was taken on 14.7.97 against
the accused.
Section 5 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Sudhakar & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 2000
221 Much reliance has been placed by Ld. Senior counsel
on the statement of PW-47 Lekh Ram Sharma during the course
of argument. It is argued that from the statement of this witness it
is proved that Congress Party was maintaining Camp Offices at
the premises of accused and election material was supplied at 12
Safdarjung Lane in presence of this witness. Ld Senior counsel
99/150
100
has argued that statement of L.R Sharma with respect to his
conversation with Mr B P Maurya is admissible in view of the fact
that Mr Maurya expired in the year 2000 and therefore could not
be produced as witness. It is argued that secondary evidence of a
witness who cannot be produced is relevant under the evidence
Act . Ld Defence counsel in this regard has placed reliance on
Sudhakar v. State of Maharashtra(2000) 6 SCC 671 ( para No 3.4
of written submission filed on behalf of accused ) I have carefully
gone through the statement of this witness. In his examination in
chief he has stated that he knew accused Sukh Ram since 1985 as
he belonged to Mandi Constituency. He was asked by Sukh Ram
to supervise construction work. Relevant portion of his
examination in chief in this regard is as under:
Section 64 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Habibulla Khan vs State Of Orissa & Anr on 2 February, 1995
289 This view has been confirmed by our Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Habibulla Khan Vs. State of Orissa, AIR 1995
SC 1123 wherein it is held as follows: