Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

State Of W.B vs Hari Narayan Bhowal on 16 March, 1994

8. Learned counsel for the respondents first of all raised the preliminary objection that in a catena of judgments, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the matter of pay scales lies with the Expert Bodies, like Pay Commission and it is not for the Courts or Tribunals to fix the pay scales. He has placed reliance on the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of State of West Bengal vs. Hari Narayan Bhowal reported in 1995 (1) SLJ 19, Union of India & Another vs. P. V. Hariharan & Anr. SCC (L&S) 838 and Union of India & Ors. vs. Makhan Chandra Roy AIR 1997 SC 239. Secondly, it is argued that the duties and responsibilities, mode of recruitment and educational qualification of the Goods Train Drivers and Tower Wagon Drivers are different. Hence, the Tower Wagon Drivers cannot compare themselves with Goods Train Drivers. In this regard, they have shown difference between the two posts, which are more or less the same as mentioned in their order dated 15.11.2010.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 65 - N P Singh - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs P.V.Hariharan & Anr on 12 March, 1997

8. Learned counsel for the respondents first of all raised the preliminary objection that in a catena of judgments, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the matter of pay scales lies with the Expert Bodies, like Pay Commission and it is not for the Courts or Tribunals to fix the pay scales. He has placed reliance on the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of State of West Bengal vs. Hari Narayan Bhowal reported in 1995 (1) SLJ 19, Union of India & Another vs. P. V. Hariharan & Anr. SCC (L&S) 838 and Union of India & Ors. vs. Makhan Chandra Roy AIR 1997 SC 239. Secondly, it is argued that the duties and responsibilities, mode of recruitment and educational qualification of the Goods Train Drivers and Tower Wagon Drivers are different. Hence, the Tower Wagon Drivers cannot compare themselves with Goods Train Drivers. In this regard, they have shown difference between the two posts, which are more or less the same as mentioned in their order dated 15.11.2010.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 154 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1