Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.27 seconds)

Zee Telefilms Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 February, 2005

24. To these facts if we apply the principles laid down by the seven-Judge Bench in Pradeep Kumar Biswas [(2002) 5 SCC 111 :2002 SCC (L&S) 633] it would be clear that the facts established do not cumulatively show that the Board is financially, functionally or administratively dominated by or is under the control of the Government. Thus the little control that the Government may Page 18 of 32 CIC/MOYAS/A/2018/123236 be said to have on the Board is not pervasive in nature. Such limited control is purely regulatory control and nothing more."
Supreme Court of India Cites 94 - Cited by 404 - Full Document

Thalappalam Ser.Coop.Bank Ltd.& Ors vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 7 October, 2013

59. At this juncture, it is also relevant to cite para 40 of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. (supra), wherein the Court has stipulated that the burden to show that an entity is a 'Public Authority' under Section 2(h) lies upon the applicant. The relevant portion reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 67 - Cited by 265 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next