Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.25 seconds)Section 409 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 44 in The Competition Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan vs U.O.I. & Ors on 12 March, 2014
The supreme Court in Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan Vs. Union of India, AIR 2014 SC 1591: 2014 AIR SCW 1713: (2014) 3 SCALE 552 observed that the Court has persistently held that our Constitution clearly provides for separation of powers and the court merely applies the law that it gets from the legislature. Consequently, the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition has insisted that the Judges should only reflect the law regardless of the anticipated consequences, considerations of fairness or public policy and the judge is simply not authorised to legislate law. " If there is a law, judges can certainly enforce it, but Judges cannot create a law and seek to enforce it" The court cannot re-write, re-cast or re-frame the legislation for the very good reason that it has no power to legislate. The very power to legislate has not been conferred on the courts.
State Of Punjab vs Renuka Singla on 26 November, 1993
In State of Punjab Vs. Renuka Singla, AIR 1994 SC 595: 1994 AIR SCW 330:(1994) 1 SCC 175,the Supreme Court observed as under:-
Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Ashrafulla Khan And Others on 14 January, 2002
Similarly, in Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Ashrafulla Khan, AIR 2002 SC 629: 2002 AIR SCW 231: (2002) 2 SCC 560, Supreme Court held as under:-