Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.56 seconds)
Bhagloo Lodh & Anr vs State Of U.P on 14 June, 2011 cites

Sahib Singh vs State Of Haryana on 28 July, 1997

7. Prompt and early reporting of the occurrence by the informant with all its vivid details gives an assurance regarding truth of its version. In case there is some delay in filing the FIR, the complainant must give explanation for the same. In absence of such an explanation, the delay may give presumption that allegations/accusations were false and had been given after thought or had given a coloured version of events. Undoubtedly, delay in lodging the FIR does not make the complainant's case improbable when such delay is properly explained. However, deliberate delay in lodging the complaint is always fatal. (Vide: Sahib Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 1997 SC 3247; Gorige Pentaiah Pentaiah v. State of 7 A.P. & Ors., (2008) 12 SCC 531; and Kishan Singh (dead) thr. Lrs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 103 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

Gorige Pentaiah vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 20 August, 2008

7. Prompt and early reporting of the occurrence by the informant with all its vivid details gives an assurance regarding truth of its version. In case there is some delay in filing the FIR, the complainant must give explanation for the same. In absence of such an explanation, the delay may give presumption that allegations/accusations were false and had been given after thought or had given a coloured version of events. Undoubtedly, delay in lodging the FIR does not make the complainant's case improbable when such delay is properly explained. However, deliberate delay in lodging the complaint is always fatal. (Vide: Sahib Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 1997 SC 3247; Gorige Pentaiah Pentaiah v. State of 7 A.P. & Ors., (2008) 12 SCC 531; and Kishan Singh (dead) thr. Lrs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 731 - Full Document
1   2 Next