Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)Goa Foundation, Goa vs Diksha Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 10 November, 2000
We find that indeed the said Diksha Holdings case covers the averments as made in the present petition also. The factual situation and the prayers are identical. The decision and the observations made therein by the Supreme Court with respect to CRZ I and the sand dunes are binding on this Court.
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 48A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994
Assam Town and Country Planning Act, 1959
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994
25. To buttress his argument Mr. Chagla relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Tata Cellular v. Union of India, . Mr. Chagla submitted that judicial review by the Court is permissible only in respect of the decision making process and the merits of the decision itself is not reviewable as the Court does not sit in appeal over those decisions while exercising power of judicial review.