Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.36 seconds)Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 122 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Archit Saini vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. on 9 February, 2018
a. In Archit Saini & Anr. v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.8, the
accident was alleged to have been caused due to a gas tanker being
7
Emphasis supplied.
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017
33. As far as loss of dependency is concerned, there was no evidence
before the Tribunal, regarding the income or educational qualifications of
the deceased. Learned counsel on both sides accepted that the Court
would, therefore, be required to proceed on the basis of the minimum
wages of an unskilled labourer in Delhi at the time of the accident, which
was undisputedly Rs. 13,584/- per month. It was also agreed that future
prospects would have to be added at 40%, in accordance with the
judgment of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay
Sethi14, and that the deduction towards personal expenses would be to the
extent of one-half, as the deceased was unmarried, and his mother was the
only person entitled to be treated as a dependent. As the deceased was 25
years of age at the time of the accident, the applicable multiplier would be
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:DAMINI
YADAV MAC.APP. 566/2018 & MAC.APP. 717/2025 Page 14 of 18
Signing Date:24.12.2025
17:33:23
18, in terms of the selection of multipliers, laid down by the Supreme
Court in Sarla Verma, and reiterated in several later judgments, including
by the Constitution Bench in Pranay Sethi.
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram on 18 September, 2018
deceased, although he died before the award was rendered, both parents
are entitled to compensation towards loss of filial consortium in the sum
of Rs. 40,000/- each, in accordance with the judgments in Magma
General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Ors.15,
United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur & Ors.16, and
National India Assurance Company Limited v. Somwati17.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur And Ors. on 30 June, 2020
deceased, although he died before the award was rendered, both parents
are entitled to compensation towards loss of filial consortium in the sum
of Rs. 40,000/- each, in accordance with the judgments in Magma
General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Ors.15,
United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur & Ors.16, and
National India Assurance Company Limited v. Somwati17.
The New India Assurance Company Limited vs Somwati on 7 September, 2020
In view of the settled position of law laid down in Satinder Kaur,
compensation towards loss of love and affection is impermissible, and
stands subsumed under the head of loss of consortium. The award of Rs.
40,000/- towards loss of love and affection is, therefore, set aside.