Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)
Maharashtra Rajya Shikshak Sena ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 22 June, 2017 cites

Shri Sitaram Sugar Company Limited & ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 March, 1990

11. "5 While exercising the power of judicial review of administrative action, the Court is not the appellate authority and '[t]he Constitution does not permit the Court to direct or advise the executive in matter of policy or to sermonize any matter which under the Constitution lies within the sphere of the Legislature or the executive, provided these authorities do not transgress their constitutional limits or statutory power. (See Ashif Hamid v. State of J. & K. SCC p. 374 para 19, Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. v. Union of India.) The scope of judicial enquiry is confined to the question whether the decision taken by the Government is against any statutory provisions or is violative of the fundamental rights of the citizens or is opposed to the provisions of the Constitution. Thus, the position is that even if the decision taken by the Government does not appear to be agreeable to the Court it cannot interfere.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 468 - T K Thommen - Full Document

State Of Orissa & Ors vs Gopinath Dash & Ors on 9 December, 2005

"The problems of Government are practical ones and may justify, if they do not require, rough accommodations, illogical it may be, and unscientific. But even such criticism should not be hastily expressed. What is the best is not always discernible, the wisdom of any choice may be disputed or condemned. Mere errors of government are not subject to our judicial review. (See: State of Orissa and others v. Gopinath Dash and Others SCC 497, paras 5-8).
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 173 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Deepak Sibal & Ors vs Punjab University And Another on 14 February, 1989

6. The Supreme Court in Deepak Sibal Vs. Punjab University and another (1989) 2 SCC 145 has observed in paragraph 20, as under, keeping in mind Article 14 and the allegations of unreasonable, discriminatory rules/circulars/resolutions, and that, if the alleged clauses are unseverable from the remaining part of the rule, the entire rule must be struck down.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 145 - M M Dutt - Full Document

T.S.R.Subramanian & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 31 October, 2013

45. We are inclined to observe that, the merit of minimum tenure and the demerit of frequent transfer needs to be kept in mind by the State/Authority. The Apex Court in T.S.R. Subramanian and others Vs. Union of India and others [(2013) 15 SCC 732 has considered this aspect. The scope of judicial review in transfer and posting matter is quite limited, unless case is made out.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 150 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document
1   2 Next