Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.71 seconds)
Jumah Khan vs The State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 5 January, 2023 cites

S.C. Legal Aid Committee Representrial ... vs Union Of India on 7 October, 1994

It is evident that the facts in Mohit Aggarwal (supra) did not involve a case of NDPS accused in custody for at least half the minimum sentence prescribed for the offence and therefore, the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in that decision did not traverse through the principles enunciated in the decision of Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 478 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Anil Kumar Vitthal Shete & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 28 April, 2006

(emphasis supplied) 5.8 This Court in Anil Kumar v. State, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 778 took the view that the directives in Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial Prisoners) v. Union of India (supra) were not meant to apply as a one-time measure as was being contended by the State on the basis of para 16 of that judgement. This Court held instead that these directives would apply as a one-time measure in all cases in which the accused persons were in jail and their trials had been delayed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 125 - C K Thakker - Full Document
1   2 3 Next