Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)Shri N.K. Ahuja vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 1 October, 2003
9. We have considered the arguments of learned counsel for the
parties and have also perused the pleadings. We have also gone
through the order of the Tribunal in OA No. 969 of 2011 (J.N.Ahuja
vs. Union of India & Ors.)(supra). We find that the applicant in OA
969 of 2011 before the Chandigarh Bench and the applicant in the
instant OA are identically situated. They are working in two different
entities of CSIR and holding the post of Security Officer. The three
pay scales applicable to the Security Officer of CIMFR, as noticed
herein above, are also applicable to the post of Security Officer in
IMTECH as noticed by the Chandigarh Bench in para 7 of its order. It
is also noticed that the applicant before the Chandigarh Bench was
seeking promotion to the next pay scale of Rs.12000-16500 which
was denied by the Tribunal on the ground that the said applicant was
holding an isolated post where there is no scope of promotion.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1