Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.41 seconds)

Matchumari China Venkatareddy And Ors. vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 19 March, 1993

10.For the same proposition of law, the learned counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon the judgment delivered by the Andhra 5/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.16665 of 2023 Pradesh High Court reported in 1994 Cri.L.J.257 [Mathumari China Venkatareddy and others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh], wherein it has been held that until the charge-sheet has been filed, a Magistrate cannot be said to have taken cognizance of any offence and that the Magistrate can take cognizance of the offence and direct the issue of process only on receipt of a police report and that till that stage is reached, he is said to be acting only as a Magistrate controlling the investigation made by the police. It has been further held in the said judgment as follows:-
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 45 - Cited by 32 - Full Document
1