Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.31 seconds)Section 351 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Lal Suraj @ Suraj Singh & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand on 18 December, 2008
The decision of Hon'ble the Apex Court Court in Mohd. Shafi
(supra), however, has been explained in Lal Suraj @ Suraj Singh and
Anr. v. State of Jharkhand [2008(16) SCALE 276], stating:
Yuvaraj Ambar Mohite vs State Of Maharashtra on 19 October, 2006
In Yuvaraj Ambar Mohite v. State of Maharashtra [2006 (10)
SCALE 369], it was observed by the Apex Court that there is a possibility of
the accused being convicted on the basis of the evidences brought on
record even if the same is taken to be correct in its entirety.
Guriya @ Tabassum Tauquir And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 28 September, 2007
In Guriya alias Tabassum Tauquir and Others v. State of
Bihar and another [(2007) 8 SCC 224], it was held by Hon'ble the Apex
Court that where there was no new material, the discretionary jurisdiction
under Section 319 of the Code can be exercised, holding:
Kailash vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 3 March, 2008
It is settled position of law that the Court has discretion under
Section 319 Cr.P.C. which is to be exercised very sparingly and to be
scrutinized with great care and caution and only if the concerned Court is
satisfied that some offence has been committed by such persons then they
be summoned as an additional accused to face trial. It has been so held
by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Kailash Vs. State of Rajasthan and another
2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 200, wherein, it has been held as under:-
Lok Ram vs Nihal Singh & Anr on 10 April, 2006
The Hon'ble Apex Court in Lok Pal v. Nihal Singh [(2006) 10
SCC 192] has observed as under:
Mohd. Shafi vs Mohd. Rafiq & Anr on 9 April, 2007
The decision of Hon'ble the Apex Court Court in Mohd. Shafi
(supra), however, has been explained in Lal Suraj @ Suraj Singh and
Anr. v. State of Jharkhand [2008(16) SCALE 276], stating:
Y. Saraba Reddy vs Puthur Rami Reddy And Anr on 7 May, 2007
In Y. Saraba Reddy v. Puthur Rami Reddy and Anr. [JT 2007
(6) SC 460], Hon'ble Supreme Court has opined as under: