Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)

Ram Kishore Sen And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 11 August, 1965

13. However, we are in agreement with the judgments/orders dated 12.07.2011 passed by this Bench of the Tribunal in OA No. 118/2011 (Ram Kishore vs. Union of India & Ors.) and OA No. 123/2011 (Padam Singh Verma vs. Union of India & Ors.), relied upon by the applicant, as more or less the facts of that cases are similar to the facts of the present case and, in the interest of justice, we feel that since applicant could not avail one chance, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to grant the applicant a fourth chance / one more chance to pass the typing test and if he is declared successful therein, he may not be reverted/demoted from the post of Clerk (Group 'C' post). In case, the applicant is unable 12 OA No. 645/2013 with MA No. 159/2021 to pass the typing test, the reversion order dated 21.08.2013 (Annexure A/1) passed by the respondents shall remain in force.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 62 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Padam Singh Verma S/O Shri Atar Singh ... vs Union Of India Through The General ... on 29 August, 2011

13. However, we are in agreement with the judgments/orders dated 12.07.2011 passed by this Bench of the Tribunal in OA No. 118/2011 (Ram Kishore vs. Union of India & Ors.) and OA No. 123/2011 (Padam Singh Verma vs. Union of India & Ors.), relied upon by the applicant, as more or less the facts of that cases are similar to the facts of the present case and, in the interest of justice, we feel that since applicant could not avail one chance, we deem it proper to direct the respondents to grant the applicant a fourth chance / one more chance to pass the typing test and if he is declared successful therein, he may not be reverted/demoted from the post of Clerk (Group 'C' post). In case, the applicant is unable 12 OA No. 645/2013 with MA No. 159/2021 to pass the typing test, the reversion order dated 21.08.2013 (Annexure A/1) passed by the respondents shall remain in force.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1