Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.08 seconds)

Santosh Kumar Dash vs The State Of Orissa And Anr. [Alongwith ... on 24 March, 1992

6. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that though the applicant and co-accused persons have been summoned under section 302/120-B IPC but the attending facts and circumstances of the case clearly show that it was a case of suicide and that no offence under Section 302 IPC is made out. Learned counsel has referred the case of Santoshi @ Santosh Kumar vs. State of U.P. (Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 438 CrPC No-5775 of 2020), decided on 18.11.2020, wherein, co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted anticipatory bail to the accused for offences under Sections 302, 328, 420 IPC.
Orissa High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 26 - B L Hansaria - Full Document

Sumedh Singh Saini vs The State Of Punjab on 3 December, 2020

Learned counsel has further referred the case of Sumedh Singh Saini Vs. State of Punjab and another (Criminal Appeal No.827of 2020), decided by Hon'ble Apex Court on 03.12.2020, wherein, anticipatory bail was granted to the accused by the Hon'ble Apex Court for offences under Section 302 IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant has further referred the case of Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia V State of Punjab AIR 1980 SC 1632.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 22 - M R Shah - Full Document
1   2 Next