Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.32 seconds)Section 8 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
A. Ayyasamy vs A. Paramasivam & Ors on 4 October, 2016
In A. Ayyasamy Vs. A. Parmasivam & Ors.7, Hon'ble Supreme
Court observed that :
"In this behalf, we have to begin our discussion with the pertinent
observation that in so far as the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996 is concerned, it does not make any specific provision
excluding any category of disputes terming them to be non
arbitrable :
M/S Emaar Mgf Land Limited vs Aftab Singh on 10 December, 2018
He further relied upon "Emmar MGF Land Limited Vs. Aftab Singh 3".
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Booz-Allen & Hamilton Inc vs Sbi Home Finance Ltd. & Ors on 15 April, 2011
It may be noticed that the cases referred to above relate to
actions in rem. A right in rem is a right exercisable against the
world at large, as contrasted from a right in personam which is
an interest protected solely against specific individuals. Actions
in personam refer to actions determining the rights and interests
of the parties themselves.