Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)
C.Karthick vs The Inspector Of Police on 21 September, 2023 cites

Dr. K. George Thomas vs The C.I.T. Kerala, Ernakulam on 23 September, 1985

In this regard it would be relevant to note here that in line with the above decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Hon'ble Court of Kerala in the matter of Thomas Vs State of Kerala through Sub Inspector, vide para 4 has held that .... As held by the Hon'ble Apex Courtin Delhi Administration Vs. Ram Singh (1962 SC 63), the special context of the Act, they will include detection, prevention and investigation of offences and the other duties which have been specifically imposed on them under the Act. Therefore, it is only the Special officer who is authorised to arrest and investigate the case under the Act, Crmc 3533/09 subject to the provisions of Section 14. Proviso to Section 14 provides that arrest without warrant can only be made by the Special Police Officer under his direction or guidance subject to his prior approval....
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 97 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Mumtaj @ Behri vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 9 August, 2002

In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment in the case of Mumtaj @ Behri Vs. The State (Government of NCT Delhi) reported in (2003 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/10 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18066 of 2022 Cri.L.J. 533, wherein, it has been held that the entire proceedings conducted by the Sub Inspector of Police in a case of involving Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act, who was not appointed as Special Police Officer was held to be illegal.
Delhi High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 24 - O P Dwivedi - Full Document
1   2 Next