Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)Janak Raj vs Gurdial Singh And Anr on 8 November, 1966
This view is supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in Janak Raj v. Gurdial Singh and Hukumchand v. Bansilal .
The Insurance (Amendment) Act, 2002
Harbans Lal vs Ram Jawai Devi And Ors. on 9 April, 1979
13. The last exception had been provided through proviso as noticed in Harbans Lal case (supra), where if objection to attachment is pending final disposal before the Court sale confirmation is not permissible. In the present proceedings, the order-sheet in this case shows that there are no objections pending. Therefore, on a textual and plain interpretation of Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, this Court has no choice, but to confirm the sale.
1