Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.42 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ajit Singh Januja & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 1 March, 1996
Yet again in Ajit Singh Januja & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors., [1996] 2
SCC 715 this Court referring to Sabharwal's case as also to the other
decision, held as under :
Jaswant Singh And Anr. vs The Secretary To Govt. Punjab Education ... on 23 August, 1989
Accordingly, the appeals are allowed and that part of the judgment of the
Full Bench in the case of Jaswant Singh v. Secy, to Govt. of Punjab is
reversed."
R. K. Sabharwal And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 10 February, 1995
Yet again in Ajit Singh Januja & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors., [1996] 2
SCC 715 this Court referring to Sabharwal's case as also to the other
decision, held as under :
Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 335 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Union Of India And Ors. Etc vs Virpal Singh Chauhan Etc on 10 October, 1995
In Union of India & Ors. v. Virpal Singh Chauhan & Ors., [1995] 6 SCC 684
this Court referring to Sabharwal (supra) held :
Chander Pal vs The State Of Haryana on 7 February, 2002
3. Chander Pal v. State of Haryana, [1997] 10 SCC 474 has to be understood
in the manner stated above."
M.G. Badappanavar And Anr. Etc vs State Of Karnataka And Ors on 1 December, 2000
In view of the aforementioned authoritative pronouncement we have no other
option but to hold that the Tribunal committed a manifest error in
declining to consider the matter on merits, upon the premise that Sabharwal
and Ajit Singh-I had been given a prospective operation. The extent to
which the said decisions had been directed to operate prospec-tively, as
noticed above, has sufficiently been explained in Ajit Singh-II and
reiterated in M.G. Badappanavar (supra).