Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.34 seconds)Section 267 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 389 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 374 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
State Of Maharashtra Tr.C.B.I vs Balakrishna Dattatrya Kumbhar on 15 October, 2012
5.19 Reading the aforesaid paras would indicate
that relying on a decision in the case of State of
Maharashtra v. Balakrishna Dattariya
Kumbhar reported in (2012) 12 SCC 364
quoting para 15 of the said judgement held that
power to stay conviction must be in exceptional
cases with great circumspection and caution.
Rama Narang vs Ramesh Narang & Ors on 19 January, 1995
61. The sole question falling for decision
was whether the order passed on 31st May,
2002 by the appellate court, whereby the
conviction and sentence of the appellant was
suspended, would amount to staying the
conviction or not. This Court, while dismissing
the appeal, perused the appellant's application
under section 389, Cr. PC and found the same
to be a routine application for suspension of
sentence without any prayer seeking stay of
conviction. Rama Narang (supra) was read to
lay down the law that section 389(1), Cr. PC
empowers the appellate court to stay the
conviction also but that, suspension of the
order appealed against would not amount to
staying the conviction.