Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)
Ramesh Amarnath Agrawal , Nashik vs Department Of Income Tax on 13 January, 2014 cites

Income Tax Officer vs M.K. Mohammed Kunhi on 11 September, 1968

This view is fortified by ratio laid down in the case of M.K. Mohammed Kunhi (supra), wherein it has been held that Tribunal has power identical to appellate court under C.P.C. We are of the view that once revenue is not able to get exact address of assessee, how it will follow the same, in case matter is decided in favour of revenue. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal. However, revenue is at liberty to get this order recalled to decide on merit in case assessee is traced by the revenue within reasonable time.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 478 - A N Grover - Full Document

C E Or & Vice Chairman, Gujarat Maritime ... vs Shri Haji Daud Haji Harun Abuand Two ... on 20 November, 1996

6. It is well settled that where a substantive power is conferred upon a Court or Tribunal, all incidental and ancillary powers necessary for an effective exercise of the substantive power have to be inferred - Chief Executive Officer and Vice- Chairman, Gujarat Maritime Board v. Haji Daud Haji Harun Abu [1996] 11 SCC 23.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 37 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1