Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.44 seconds)
Onkar Nath Singh @ Sheru Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 19 July, 2017 cites

Abuzar Hossain @ Gulam Hossain vs State Of West Bengal on 10 October, 2012

17. In Mukarrub etc. vs. State of U.P. reported in 2017 Cr.L.J. 1013 wherein the plea of juvenility was taken before the Apex Court for the first time by the appellant who happens to be convict along with others for an offence punishable under Section 302/149 IPC, 148 IPC, has also considered the principle decided in Abuzar Hossain v. State of W.B. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 489, Parag Bhati (Juvenile) through legal guardian-mother-Rajni Bhati vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. reported in (2016) 12 SCC 744 and concurred the same.
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 163 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Chand Kumar Bhati And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 22 September, 2015

17. In Mukarrub etc. vs. State of U.P. reported in 2017 Cr.L.J. 1013 wherein the plea of juvenility was taken before the Apex Court for the first time by the appellant who happens to be convict along with others for an offence punishable under Section 302/149 IPC, 148 IPC, has also considered the principle decided in Abuzar Hossain v. State of W.B. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 489, Parag Bhati (Juvenile) through legal guardian-mother-Rajni Bhati vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. reported in (2016) 12 SCC 744 and concurred the same.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 4 - R Sinha - Full Document

Om Prakash vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 13 April, 2012

16. The mode of activity being adopted by a juvenile during course of commission of a crime in a background, as discussed hereinabove happens to be matter of concerned and the Hon'ble Apex Court in Parag Bhati (Juvenile) through legal guardian-mother-Rajni Bhati vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. reported in (2016) 12 SCC 744 has held after taking into consideration the principle decided at an earlier occasion in Om Prakash vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. reported in (2012) 5 SCC 201, Abuzar Hossain v. State of W.B. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 489, Ashwani Kumar Saxena vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in (2012) 9 SCC 750 and culled down the same in following way:
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 333 - Full Document

Akbar Sheikh & Ors vs State Of West Bengal on 5 May, 2009

18. Adverting to facts of the case, it is apparent that appellant, in order to buttress his claim to be a juvenile, filed certificate of Class-X issued by Ucchatar Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Delhi. Furthermore, by another supplementary affidavit a communiqué issued by the said institution has also been placed to suggest that the same happens to be duly recognized as equivalent to matric for the purpose of appointment in government service. But, failed to produce any other notification of the Government of Bihar to the effect that the aforesaid Class-X degree has been recognized as equivalent degree of matriculation issued by the Bihar School Examination Board or Central Board of Secondary Education. Another document, the birth certificate has also been placed which has been issued in the year 2015, after the occurrence and so happens to be doubtful over its authentication as has been held by Patna High Court D. REF. No.3 of 2016 dt.19-07-2017 14 the Hon'ble Apex Court in Akbar Sheikh v. State of W.B. reported in (2009) 7 SCC 415 as well as Pawan v. State of Uttaranchal, reported in (2009) 15 SCC 259.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 60 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 Next