Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.19 seconds)Section 2 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
M/S Swastik Gases Pvt Ltd vs Indian Oil Corp Ltd on 13 October, 2011
10. Counsel for the applicant has referred to Section 2(1)(e) of the
Act in support of his plea relating to the meaning of the word "Court" and
has placed reliance upon the judgment of the Delhi High Court in the
matter of International Breweries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mohan Meakins Ltd. and
Anr., reported in 153(2008) DLT 399, but the Supreme Court in the matter
of Swastik Gases Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has duly considered Section 2(1)(e) of the
Act while holding contrary to what has been submitted by the applicant
before this Court."
International Breweries Pvt. Ltd vs Mohan Meakins Ltd. & Anr on 4 September, 2008
10. Counsel for the applicant has referred to Section 2(1)(e) of the
Act in support of his plea relating to the meaning of the word "Court" and
has placed reliance upon the judgment of the Delhi High Court in the
matter of International Breweries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mohan Meakins Ltd. and
Anr., reported in 153(2008) DLT 399, but the Supreme Court in the matter
of Swastik Gases Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has duly considered Section 2(1)(e) of the
Act while holding contrary to what has been submitted by the applicant
before this Court."
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Harshad Chiman Lal Modi vs Dlf Universal & Anr on 26 September, 2005
07- Reliance has also been placed upon a judgment
delivered in the case of Harshad Chiman Lal Modi Vs. DLF
Universal Ltd. & Anr. reported in (2005) 7 SCC 791 and in the
aforesaid case it has been held that agreement restricting
jurisdiction to one of the many Courts having jurisdiction, not
opposed to public policy, and is legal, valid and enforceable. In the
present case agreement has been executed in respect of various
-4-
Writ Petition No.6685/2016
licensees / agents by A. H. Wheeler and Company Pvt. Ltd. all over
India and in those circumstances, the clause relating to jurisdiction
at Allahabad is certainly permissible in light of the aforesaid
judgment and the judgment is again of no help to the petitioner.