Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.48 seconds)
R.Gunasekar vs The Government Of India on 23 November, 2018 cites

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union Of India & Ors on 10 April, 2006

7. Conversely, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for fourth respondent would submit that in spite of a strong objection by the fourth respondent, the District Level Committee has granted permission to the petitioner for setting up shrimp culture. He would also submit that fourth respondent has made objections not only to the petitioner's shrimp farm, but also to those of the other applicants, on the ground that large volumes of water would be pumped from wetland and there is no other source for the farm units except the wetland, and, therefore, the http://www.judis.nic.in 14 grant of permission is illegal. The learned Additional Government Pleader has relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court in S.Jagannath v. Union of India, dated 11.12.1996, and T.N.Godavarman Thirumalpad v. Union of India and Others, (2006) 5 SCC 28, to say that the Apex Court has directed that no shrimp culture pond can be constructed or set up within the coastal regulation zone as defined in the CRZ notification and the same shall be applicable to all seas, bays, estuaries, creeks, rivers and backwaters, including the case of the petitioner herein.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 69 - Full Document

S. Jagannath vs Union Of India & Ors on 11 December, 1996

7. Conversely, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for fourth respondent would submit that in spite of a strong objection by the fourth respondent, the District Level Committee has granted permission to the petitioner for setting up shrimp culture. He would also submit that fourth respondent has made objections not only to the petitioner's shrimp farm, but also to those of the other applicants, on the ground that large volumes of water would be pumped from wetland and there is no other source for the farm units except the wetland, and, therefore, the http://www.judis.nic.in 14 grant of permission is illegal. The learned Additional Government Pleader has relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court in S.Jagannath v. Union of India, dated 11.12.1996, and T.N.Godavarman Thirumalpad v. Union of India and Others, (2006) 5 SCC 28, to say that the Apex Court has directed that no shrimp culture pond can be constructed or set up within the coastal regulation zone as defined in the CRZ notification and the same shall be applicable to all seas, bays, estuaries, creeks, rivers and backwaters, including the case of the petitioner herein.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 102 - K Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next