Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)
P.Thangavel vs The Personal Assistant (General) on 5 September, 2012 cites

R. Kandasmy vs The Chief Engineer, Madras Port Trust on 22 August, 1997

11. The learned Senior Counsel relied upon the judgment reported in JT 1997 (7) S.C. 660 (R.Kandasamy v. The Chief Engineer, Madras Port Trust), wherein the Honourable Supreme Court, held that the certificates issued by the Tahsildars on or before 11.11.1989 are valid for all purposes. Therefore, the certificate issued to the petitioner in the year 1976 is valid for all purposes. The second respondent ought not have rejected the community certificate issued to the petitioner in the year 1976.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 100 - K Venkataswami - Full Document

Phool Chand And Ors. vs Laxmi Narain on 12 October, 1971

i) (2005) 12 SCC 248 (Phool Chandra Singh v. Laxmi Prasad), wherein the Honourable Supreme Court held that when earlier certificate granted in favour of the father, mother, grand-father as well as maternal uncle as 'Gond' community, son is also entitled to grant of caste community certificate similar to the certificate issued in favour of father, mother, grand-father and maternal uncle.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

G.M.Malini vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 21 April, 2009

iii) CDJ 2009 MHC 2051 (G.M.Malini & Anr. V. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vellore District). Wherein in the Division Bench one of us (MDJ) was a party, held that there is absolutely no justifiable reason on the part of the respondents therein to reject the request of the petitioners for the issuance of the community certificate, when the petitioners therein along with their applications produced community certificates of grand-father, paternal grandfather, father and brother as belonging to Hindu Kurumans Community and the genuineness of the same have not been questioned by the respondents therein.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - K M Ram - Full Document
1