Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.26 seconds)Section 25 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Jagatguru Shri Shankaracharya Jyotish ... vs Ramji Tripathi And Ors. on 13 November, 1978
18. Apart from the judgment of my learned brother CYS, J in Reghavendra Export's case (2 supra), similar view was also expressed by a Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Swami Swaroopanand v. Ramji, (D.B.).
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Vempati Sarada vs Vempati Kaladhar on 27 March, 2003
In the judgment of my learned brother Justice P.S. Narayana, in Vempati Sarada's case (1 supra), the point of controversy was not mainly with regard to the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 23(3) of the Code. The learned Judge apart from reaffirming that convenience of the wife has to be taken into consideration, mainly considered the contention with regard to conflict of jurisdictions of High Court and Supreme Court under Sections 23(3) and 25 of the Code. The relevant portion of the judgment of the learned single Judge in this regard at paragraph No. 11 is extracted as under:
Western U.P. Electric And Power Supply ... vs Hind Lamps Ltd. on 17 February, 1969
considering various judgments of different High Courts and also the Supreme Court in Western U.P. Electric & Power Supply Co. Ltd. v. Hind Lamps Ltd., 1969 (2) SCWR 16. In the said judgment the Division Bench held at paragraph 10 that "Where a suit is sought to be transferred to a court subordinate to another High Court, the application for transfer has to be made in the High Court within whose jurisdiction the suit is pending".
Raghavendra Exports And Anr. vs Nawaker Enterprises And Anr. on 17 September, 2003
18. Apart from the judgment of my learned brother CYS, J in Reghavendra Export's case (2 supra), similar view was also expressed by a Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Swami Swaroopanand v. Ramji, (D.B.).
1