Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)

Khoday Distilleries Ltd vs State Of Karnataka on 19 October, 1994

The Division Bench in the above judgment took the view that no one has a fundamental right to trade in liquor as reiterated by the Supreme Court in Khoday Distilleries v. State of Karnataka, 1995 (1) SCC 574. Licence to trade in liquor is merely a privilege given to the licensee and, on the expiry of the licence, no right survives in the licensee, if the licence has not been renewed. The Division Bench was of the view that renewal of licence stands practically on the same footing as grant of fresh licence and that, in a case where the licence had become defunct or had not been renewal for a long period of time, the claimant cannot have a right of renewal by relying on the proviso to Rule 14 of the Rules by contending that, however long the period of disruption may be, the authority is obliged to renew the licence. We respectfully agree with this view.
Supreme Court of India Cites 53 - Cited by 408 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Government Of Kerala And Anr. vs M. Kunha Abdulla on 21 March, 1989

9. Learned counsel relied on two judgments of this Court reported in State of Kerala v. Abdulla Kunhi, 1998 (2) KLJ 620 and M.R. Tourist Home v. State of Kerala, 1999 (2) KLJ 1140. Having red these two judgments, we are of the view that the Division Benches which decided the judgments were not even called upon to go into the contentions urged here, but the Division Bench which decided W.A. No. 2990 of 2000 went squarely into and decided the first contention.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1