Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.49 seconds)

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Nikku Ram And Ors on 30 August, 1995

The Hon'ble Supreme court in State of HP Vs Nikku Ram & Ors. (1995)6 SCC 219 while interpreting the provisions of section 498­A IPC observed that harassment to constitute cruelty under section 498­A explanation(b) must have the nexus with the demand of dowry and if this is missing the case will fall beyond the scope of section 498­A. The precondition for attracting the provision of this section is the demand and if the demand is missing and the FIR NO. 414/04 PS CHANDNI CHOWK STATE VS. KAILASH SHARMA 9 cruelty is for the sake of giving torture to the woman without any nexus with the demand then such a cruelty will not be covered under explanation(b).
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 152 - Full Document
1   2 Next