Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)R.Balakrishna Pillai vs State Of Kerala on 28 February, 2003
Very recently in Ramesh Chand Ardawaitya v. Anil Panjwani, , reviewing the provisions of Order 8, the Apex Court in Para-26 of its judgment held thus:
Smt. Shanti Rani Das Dewanjee vs Dinesh Chandra (Dead) By Lrs on 18 September, 1997
In the process the Apex Court sought to distinguish its earlier two judgments in Mahendera Kumar's case (supra) and another a judgment in Shanti Rani Das Dewanjee v. Dinesh Chandra Day, .
Section 134 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Madanapalle Municipality vs Syed Ahamad And Ors. on 30 October, 2002
13. The learned Counsel for the plaintiff sought to place reliance upon the judgment of this Court in Madanapalle Municipality v. Syed Ahamad, 2003 (1) ALD 729, wherein this Court reiterated the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the judgment referred supra by holding that the counter-claim could be made even after the filing of the written statement, provided the cause of action arose prior to the filing of the written statement or prior to the date fixed for filing of the writ petition, subject however, to the condition that it should be filed within the limitation prescribed.
1