Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.35 seconds)

Union Of India (Uoi) vs Anil Chanana And Anr. on 25 January, 2008

18. From the contentions of respondent-DRI in remand application, the counter affidavit and submissions advanced, we do not find any statutory bar in filing or entertaining an application for compounding under section 137(3) of the Act in patilsr 13/ 19 ::: Uploaded on - 27/09/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 28/09/2019 02:58:24 ::: wp-4779/19(J) respect of exotic animals. The case of Anil Chanana (supra) is ex-facie distinguishable on facts where the Applicant had failed to account for his possession of diamond ear-rings and took self - contradictory steps, as narrated in the judgment . Here, no exotic animals have been recovered from the possession of the Petitioner. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has categorically stated that the Petitioner is not even claiming the seized ani9mals.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - S H Kapadia - Full Document
1   2 Next