Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.18 seconds)The Punjab Tenancy Rules
The Specific Relief Act, 1963
Lal Bahadur Singh vs Surajpal Singh And Anr. on 21 February, 1946
7. On behalf of the applicant reliance has been placed upon a single Judge ruling of this Court reported in Lal Bahadur Singh v. Surajpal Singh A.I.R. (33) 1946 ALL. 486. In that case a suit was instituted in the civil Court under Section 9, Specific Relief Act, for possession over certain plots of land-presumably tenancy land-and the defence was that the civil Court had no jurisdiction to try the suit, as it was barred from the cognizance of that Court in view of the provisions of Section 242, Tenancy Act. It was held that "the summary cause of action provided by Section 9, Specific Relief Act" was not the same thing
as the cause of action, which is really a cause of action cased on title, covered by the relevant sections of the V.P. Tenancy Act
and that the relief claimed in a suit
under the Specific Relief Act was not such as might have been claimed in any suit or application based on a cause of action under the machinery of the U.P. Tenancy Act,
so the suit was cogzizable by the civil Court. As I will presently show, this case has no bearing on the facts of the present case.
1