Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.28 seconds)
Samir Nath vs South Eastern Railway on 18 March, 2025 cites

Kunal Singh vs Union Of India & Anr on 13 February, 2003

3. Learned counsel for the applicant would contend that this aspect of the matter is also question of law which can be dealt with even if it has not been clearly spelt out either in defence statement or at the appellate stage, for which he relies upon the decision rendered in the case of Kunal Singh vs. Union of India & Anr. reported in 2003(4) SCC 524. The relevant portion of the said judgment is extracted hereinbelow:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 344 - S V Patil - Full Document

Sakshi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 26 May, 2004

Some evidence has come on record to indicate or rather substantiate the allegations of sexual harassment levelled. What is most important to note at this stage ,when ample opportunity has been given to applicant and all codal formalities were followed , the inquiry should be conducted as far as practicable as per the procedure laid down in these rules , the law does not permit it to go into the issue of sufficiency of evidence for the purpose of holding a public servant guilty of the alleged misconduct , in case of sexual harassment , the detailed enquiry having being conducted cannot be vitiated on the ground that case ought to have been preceded with before an Internal Committee only being a technical pleas raised. Even otherwise, there is nothing to indicate that Complaint Committee was in place. We find having participated in enquiry proceedings not challenge was laid to procedure set out by the respondents in conducting the enquiry.
Supreme Court of India Cites 47 - Cited by 69 - G P Mathur - Full Document
1   2 Next