Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.32 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Mrs. Harpreet Kaur Harvinder Singh Bedi vs State Of Maharashtra And Another on 21 January, 1992
The issue as regards satisfaction arrived at on grounds of 'public
order' and "public peace and law and order' and its consequences, came Up
for consideration before a Division Bench of the composite High Court for
the States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh in Vasanthe Sumalatha wv.
State of Andhra Pradesh?, wherein, the Division Bench, having dealt
with the expressions 'public order' and law and order' in detail and having
referred to the judgments of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of
Police v. C.Anita ((2004) 7 SCC 467], Kuso Sah v. State of Bihar
pao74) 1 $cc 485], Harpreet Kaur v. State of Maharashtra
r(1992) 2 SCC 177], T.K&.Gopal v. State of Karnataka ((2000) 6 5CC
42046 (L) ALT 728 (DBS MERE sages
Be nrennseesiss HAIR NISRA
WENO. ATO?
State Of Maharashtra vs Mohd. Yakub S/O Abdul Hamid & Ors on 4 March, 1980
of 2018
168], State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub [(1980) 3 Scc 37],
Ram Manohar Lohia v. The State of Bihar (AIR 1966 SC 740), held
as follows:
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Commissioner Of Police And Ors vs Smt. C. Anita on 23 August, 2004
The issue as regards satisfaction arrived at on grounds of 'public
order' and "public peace and law and order' and its consequences, came Up
for consideration before a Division Bench of the composite High Court for
the States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh in Vasanthe Sumalatha wv.
State of Andhra Pradesh?, wherein, the Division Bench, having dealt
with the expressions 'public order' and law and order' in detail and having
referred to the judgments of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of
Police v. C.Anita ((2004) 7 SCC 467], Kuso Sah v. State of Bihar
pao74) 1 $cc 485], Harpreet Kaur v. State of Maharashtra
r(1992) 2 SCC 177], T.K&.Gopal v. State of Karnataka ((2000) 6 5CC
42046 (L) ALT 728 (DBS MERE sages
Be nrennseesiss HAIR NISRA
WENO. ATO?
Section 10 in The Andhra Pradesh Prevention Of Dangerous Activities Of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders And Land-Grabbers Act, 1986. [Entire Act]
The Andhra Pradesh Prevention Of Dangerous Activities Of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders And Land-Grabbers Act, 1986.
Section 2 in The Andhra Pradesh Prevention Of Dangerous Activities Of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders And Land-Grabbers Act, 1986. [Entire Act]
Kuso Sah vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 November, 1973
The issue as regards satisfaction arrived at on grounds of 'public
order' and "public peace and law and order' and its consequences, came Up
for consideration before a Division Bench of the composite High Court for
the States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh in Vasanthe Sumalatha wv.
State of Andhra Pradesh?, wherein, the Division Bench, having dealt
with the expressions 'public order' and law and order' in detail and having
referred to the judgments of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of
Police v. C.Anita ((2004) 7 SCC 467], Kuso Sah v. State of Bihar
pao74) 1 $cc 485], Harpreet Kaur v. State of Maharashtra
r(1992) 2 SCC 177], T.K&.Gopal v. State of Karnataka ((2000) 6 5CC
42046 (L) ALT 728 (DBS MERE sages
Be nrennseesiss HAIR NISRA
WENO. ATO?