Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.20 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
S. Anand vs Vasumathi Chandrasekar on 14 February, 2008
12. Also in case titled as S. Anand versus
Vasumathi Chandrasekar, reported in (2008) 4 Supreme
Court Cases 67, wherein the complaint under Section 138 of
the NI Act was dismissed by the trial Court exercising the
power under Section 256 CrPC on failure of the complainant or
her power of attorney or the lawyer appointed by her to
appear in Court on the date of hearing fixed for examination of
witnesses on behalf of the defence, the apex Court has
considered as to whether provisions of Section 256 CrPC,
providing for disposal of a complaint in default, could have
been resorted to in the facts of the case as the witnesses on
behalf of the complainant have already been examined and it
has been held that in such a situation, particularly, when the
accused had been examined under Section 313 CrPC, the
Court was required to pass a judgment on merit in the matter.
Vinod Kumar Verma vs Ranjeet Singh Rathore on 6 May, 2016
15. Coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal
Appeal No. 367 of 2015, titled as Vinod Kumar Verma
versus Ranjeet Singh Rathore, decided on 6th May, 2016
and Criminal Appeal No. 559 of 2017, titled as Harpal
Singh versus Lajwanti, decided on 13th October, 2017, has
::: Downloaded on - 28/11/2022 20:31:43 :::CIS
8
held that dismissal of the complaint in default for non-
Harpal Singh vs Lajwanti on 13 October, 2017
15. Coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal
Appeal No. 367 of 2015, titled as Vinod Kumar Verma
versus Ranjeet Singh Rathore, decided on 6th May, 2016
and Criminal Appeal No. 559 of 2017, titled as Harpal
Singh versus Lajwanti, decided on 13th October, 2017, has
::: Downloaded on - 28/11/2022 20:31:43 :::CIS
8
held that dismissal of the complaint in default for non-
Dole Raj Thakur vs Pankaj Prashar on 6 January, 2018
16. The same principle has been reiterated by this
Court in cases titled Dole Raj Thakur versus Pankaj
Prashar, reported in Latest HLJ 2018(HP) 266; Dole Raj
Thakur versus Jagdish Shishodia, reported in Latest HLJ
2018 (HP) 296 and in Cr. Appeal No. 301 of 2018 titled
Hemant Kumar vs. Sher Singh decided on 27.9.2018.
Dole Raj Thakur vs Jagdish Shishodia on 11 January, 2018
16. The same principle has been reiterated by this
Court in cases titled Dole Raj Thakur versus Pankaj
Prashar, reported in Latest HLJ 2018(HP) 266; Dole Raj
Thakur versus Jagdish Shishodia, reported in Latest HLJ
2018 (HP) 296 and in Cr. Appeal No. 301 of 2018 titled
Hemant Kumar vs. Sher Singh decided on 27.9.2018.
Vinay Kumar And Others vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Another on 6 September, 2019
6. I am in agreement with finding returned by
Allahabad High Court in case titled as Vinay Kumar versus
State of U.P. & Anr., reported in 2007 Cri.L.J. 3161, and
another judgment passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in
case titled as N.K. Sharma versus M/s Accord Plantations
::: Downloaded on - 28/11/2022 20:31:43 :::CIS
4
Pvt. Ltd. & another, reported in 2008 (2) Latest HLJ 1249
with respect to applicability of Section 256 CrPC in a complaint
.