Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.29 seconds)

Rishi And Anr. vs State Of Bihar on 17 November, 1954

In In re, Ramaswami Reddiar, 1952 Mad WN 897: (A.I.R. 1953 Mad 138), a Bench of this Court held that a confession recorded by a magistrate holding an inquest Under Section 176 Cr.PC, and not empowered to record confessions Under Section 164 Cr.PC, is not inadmissible for non compliance with that Section. (See also the decision to the same effect of other High Courts assembled in the A.I.R. Manual Second Edition (i960) Vol. IV at page 4556 Section 164 n. 9a Ram Saran v. Crown A.I.R. 1945 Nag 72: 46 Cri LJ 731; Rishi v. State of Bihar ; Barindra Kumar v. Emperor, 11 Cr LJ 453: ILR 37 Ca 467; Sulaiman v. The King A.I.R. 1941 Rang 301: 43 Cr LJ 123; Ram Singh v. State A.I.R. 1959 AH 518: 1959 Cr LJ 940: State v. Madan Mohan A.I.R. 1953 Pepsu 182: 1953 Cr LJ 1700; Chhutkannoo Singh v. Rex.
Patna High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 Next