Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.24 seconds)
Reserve Bank Of India, Bombay vs C.T. Dighe And Others on 27 July, 1981 cites

Reserve Bank Of India vs N. C. Paliwal & Others on 24 August, 1976

These observations in Paliwal's case are equally applicable to the case before us. It was competent for the Bank to introduce a combined promotional scheme for the clerical staff, stenographers, and personal assistants and the Bank was not bound to wait until all employees belonging to the clerical cadre whose names were already in the panel when circular No. 6 was introduced had been promoted as staff officers Grade A. There was no such assurance given by the Bank when it introduced circular No. 8 on which the complainants rely. The Bank did not undertake that it would not take any step to change the conditions the stenographers and the personal assistants were required to satisfy to be able to appear in the test until all the clerks already empanelled were promoted. Circular No. 6 cannot therefore be assailed on the ground that it was introduced when some employees belonging to the clerical grade whose names were already in the panel remained to be promoted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 41 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1