Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.58 seconds)
Jiwan Kumar Garg vs Supreme Court Of India on 28 October, 2016 cites

Cen.Pub.Information Officer,Sci & Anr vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal on 26 November, 2010

9. The respondent referred to appellant's RTI application dated 7.7.2015 and stated that the issue of providing information relating to appointment/transfer of Hon'ble Judges as also complaints received against them including supply of copies of confidential correspondence, is the subject matter of judicial proceedings in SLP Nos. 328555-56 of 2009, now converted into Civil Appeal Nos. 10044-45 of 2010 which are now sub-judice before Hon'be Supreme Court. Further, in terms of order dated 4.12.2009 in SLP(C) No. 32855-56 titled "Central Public Information Officer & Anr. V. Subhash Chandra Agarwal" there is a stay on disclosure of information relating to matters like the present one.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 11 - B S Reddy - Full Document

Indira Jaising vs Registrar General,Supreme Court Of ... on 9 May, 2003

Further, the disclosure of information and reports emanating out of a self evolved mechanism which is in the nature of an In-House Procedure by the judiciary is expressly prohibited in terms of decision dated 9.5.2003 in Writ Petiton (Civil) No.218 of 2003 titled Indira Jaising Vs. Registrar General, Supreme Court of India. Hence disclosure of information in this regard may constitute contempt of court. Therefore, the information of the nature sought by the appellant is exempted under section 8(1)(b) of the RTI Act, 2005. The respondent further stated that the information sought by the appellant is confidential and is exempted u/s 8(1)(e) and (j) of the RTI Act, 2005 and he has no right to access the said information under section 2(j) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 18 - Full Document
1