Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)
Qureshi Hafeez Ahmed Habib Ahmed vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 23 February, 2018 cites

Kiran Manikrao Bhusare And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 15 January, 2018

10) This Court has already held that teaching staff of private unaided Pharmacy College is entitled to get the aforesaid revised scales in the decision of Writ Petition No.5150/2013 at this Seat (Kiran Bhusare and Others vs. State of Maharashtra and others). In the past, this Court had given decision in respect of teaching and non teaching staff of private unaided institutions running professional courses and it is held that private unaided institutions are bound to implement the aforesaid scales.
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 12 - T V Nalawade - Full Document

Secretary Mahatama Gandhi Mission & Arn vs Bhartiya Kamgar Sena And Ors on 5 January, 2017

This decision is confirmed by the Apex Court in the case reported as 2017(1) ALL MR 947 (SC) (Secretary Mahatma Gandhi Mission and Anr. vs. Bhartiya Kamgar Sena and Ors). As in that matter also technical institution was involved, it can be said that the respondent management cannot contend that private unaided ::: Uploaded on - 27/02/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 28/02/2018 01:26:10 ::: 23 WP 9904-9912/2011 group institution cannot be compelled to implement the aforesaid pay scales.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 132 - Full Document

Fee Regulatory Committee vs Kalol Inst.Of Mgt on 11 October, 2011

11) The contention of the respondent-management that it is charging less fees cannot be considered in a proceeding like present one as a defence. Firstly because in respect of most of the students who are unable to pay the fees, the management gets reimbursement of their fees under various Government schemes like schemes made for Backward Classes students, Economically Backward Classes students and the Other Backward Classes students. Further, as per the procedure laid down for fixing the fees of such courses by Fee Regulatory Committee, the Fee Regulatory Committee is bound to consider the liability of such institution to pay salary to teaching and non-teaching staff. On this point, the case reported as 2011 DGLS(SC) 830 (Fee Regulatory Committee v. Kalol Institute of Management) can be referred. The Apex Court has made it clear that the Fee Regulatory Committee is bound to consider the amount spent by the institution for implementing the revision of pay scales.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 21 - A K Patnaik - Full Document

Islamic Academy Of Education And ... vs State Of Karnataka And Others on 14 August, 2003

14) In Islamic Academy Of Education's case (cited supra) the Apex Court has quoted permissible regulations/restrictions governing the enjoyment of Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India and it is laid down that framing of rules and regulations governing the conditions of service of teaching and non teaching staff and their pay and allowances is a permissible restriction.
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 767 - V N Khare - Full Document
1