Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.21 seconds)Article 311 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Gujarat & Another vs Raman Lal Keshav Lal Soni & Others on 27 January, 1983
In the matter of State of Gujarat Vs. Raman Lal
Keshav Lal4, the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has
held as under:-
Article 310 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 70 in Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Roshan Lal Tandon vs Union Of India on 14 August, 1967
In the matter of Union Public Service Commission Vs.
Dr.Jamuna Kurup and others8 Their Lordships of the Supreme
Court while relying upon other two judgments of the Supreme
Court in Roshan Lal Tandon Vs. Union of India 9 and Dinesh
Chandra Sangma Vs. State of Assam 10 have held that
6 (1977) 3 SCC 94
7 (2006) 2 SCC 482
8 (2008) 11 SCC 10
9 AIR 1967 SC 1889
10 (1977) 4 SCC 441
9
employment under the Government is a matter of status and
further held that contract employees of the Government were
governed by the terms of contract and did not possess the
status of government servants, nor were governed by the Rules
framed under Article 309 of the Constitution, nor enjoyed the
protection under Article 311 and further held that municipal
employees are not government servants governed by Articles
309 to 311.
Dinesh Chandra Sangma vs State Of Assam & Ors on 5 October, 1977
In the matter of Union Public Service Commission Vs.
Dr.Jamuna Kurup and others8 Their Lordships of the Supreme
Court while relying upon other two judgments of the Supreme
Court in Roshan Lal Tandon Vs. Union of India 9 and Dinesh
Chandra Sangma Vs. State of Assam 10 have held that
6 (1977) 3 SCC 94
7 (2006) 2 SCC 482
8 (2008) 11 SCC 10
9 AIR 1967 SC 1889
10 (1977) 4 SCC 441
9
employment under the Government is a matter of status and
further held that contract employees of the Government were
governed by the terms of contract and did not possess the
status of government servants, nor were governed by the Rules
framed under Article 309 of the Constitution, nor enjoyed the
protection under Article 311 and further held that municipal
employees are not government servants governed by Articles
309 to 311.
M/S Arun Singh Bhadouria vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 July, 2014
14. Thereafter, in the matter of Gajpalsingh Rathore Vs.
State of M.P. and others12 the High Court of Madhya Pradesh
has relied upon the matters of Arun Singh Bhadouriya
(supra) and Girish Jayantilal Vaghela (supra) and held that
that employee working as Shiksha Karmi on contractual basis is
not a government employee.